Results from a first-in-human phase i safety trial to evaluate the use of a vascularized pericranial/temporoparietal fascial flap to line the resection cavity following resection of newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: The efficacy of systemic therapies for glioblastoma (GBM) remains limited due to the constraints of systemic toxicity and blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability. Temporoparietal fascial flaps (TPFFs) and vascularized peri cranial flaps (PCF) are not restricted by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), as they derive their vascular supply from branches of the external carotid artery. Transposition of a vascularized TPFF or PCF along a GBM resection cavity may bring autologous tissue not restricted by the BBB in close vicinity to the tumor bed microenvironment, permit ingrowth of vascular channels fed by the external circulation, and offer a mechanism of bypassing the BBB. In addition, circulating immune cells in the vascularized flap may have better access to tumor-associated antigens (TAA) within the tumor microenvironment. We conducted a first-in-human Phase I trial assessing the safety of lining the resection cavity with autologous TPFF/PCF of newly diagnosed patients with GBM. METHODS: 12 patients underwent safe, maximal surgical resection of newly diagnosed GBMs, followed by lining of the resection cavity with a pedicled, autologous TPFF or PCF. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. Secondary analysis of efficacy was examined as the proportion of patients experiencing progression-free disease (PFS) as indicated by response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria and overall survival (OS). The study was powered to determine whether a Phase II study was warranted based on these early results. For this analysis, subjects who were alive and had not progressed as of the date of the last follow-up were considered censored and all living patients who were alive as of the date of last follow-up were considered censored for overall survival. For simplicity, we assumed that a 70% PFS rate at 6 months would be considered an encouraging response and would make an argument for further investigation of the procedure. RESULTS: Median age of included patients was 57 years (range 46-69 years). All patients were Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype. Average tumor volume was 56.6 cm3 (range 14-145 cm3). Resection was qualified as gross total resection (GTR) of all of the enhancing diseases in all patients. Grade III or above adverse events were encountered in 3 patients. No Grade IV or V serious adverse events occurred in the immediate post-operative period including seizure, infection, stroke, or tumor growing along the flap. Disease progression at the site of the original tumor was identified in only 4 (33%) patients (median 23 months, range 8-25 months), 3 of whom underwent re-operation. Histopathological analyses of those implanted flaps and tumor bed biopsy at repeat surgery demonstrated robust immune infiltrates within the transplanted flap. Importantly, no patient demonstrated evidence of tumor infiltration into the implanted flap. At the time of this manuscript preparation, only 4/12 (33%) of patients have died. Based on the statistical considerations above and including all 12 patients 10/12 (83.3%) had 6-month PFS. The median PFS was 9.10 months, and the OS was 17.6 months. 4/12 (33%) of patients have been alive for more than two years and our longest surviving patient currently is alive at 60 months. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that insertion of pedicled autologous TPFF/PCF along a GBM resection cavity is safe and feasible. Based on the encouraging response rate in 6-month PFS and OS, larger phase II studies are warranted to assess and reproduce safety, feasibility, and efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION FOR PROSPECTIVELY REGISTERED TRIALS: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03630289, dated: 08/02/2018.

Symptomatic infratentorial ependymal cyst arising from the medulla: a case report with review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Ependymal cysts (EC) typically present supra-tentorially near the lateral ventricle, juxta ventricular, or temporoparietal regions. Previous cases have also identified infratentorial EC of the brainstem, cerebellum, and subarachnoid spaces. They are mostly asymptomatic. In this paper, we present the first-ever case of a symptomatic medullary ependymal cyst treated with surgery, along with a comprehensive review of the literature on EC of other parts of the brain stem. CASE DESCRIPTION: This 51-year-old female presented with hearing loss, dizziness, diplopia, and ataxia. Radiographic imaging indicated the presence of a non-enhancing lesion in the medulla with a mass effect on the brainstem. Pathological examination confirmed its characterization as an ependymal cyst. The patient underwent a suboccipital craniotomy for the fenestration of the medullary ependymal cyst under neuro-navigation, Intra-op ultrasound and intra-operative neuro-monitoring. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of an ependymal cyst. At one month follow-up, her KPS is 90, ECOG PS 1, and her ataxia has improved with complete resolution of diplopia. CONCLUSION: Due to their rarity and potential similarity to other cystic structures, EC may be overlooked or incorrectly diagnosed resulting in mismanagement and surgical disaster. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding and awareness of their distinct characteristics are essential for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.

An algorithm for the treatment of concurrent pituitary adenoma and cavernous sinus aneurysm: A systematic review & case report.

BACKGROUND: Rarely, Pituitary adenomas (PA) can co-occur with intrasellar or intracavernous aneurysms. There is currently no clear guidance for the management of this dual pathology. We attempt to provide an algorithm to help guide clinical decision making for treatment of PAs co-occurring with adjacent cerebral aneurysms. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines using various databases. Search terms included "(Pituitary Adenoma OR Prolactinoma OR Macroadenoma OR Adenoma) AND (ICA OR Internal Carotid Artery OR paracliniod OR clinoid) Aneurysm AND (Intra-cavernous OR intracavernous OR intrasellar OR Cavernous)." RESULTS: A total of 24 studies with 24 patients were included. Twelve (50%) patients experienced visual symptoms. Ten patients (42%) had an aneurysm embedded within the adenoma. Fourteen patients (58%) had an aneurysm adjacent to the adenoma. Embedded aneurysms were significantly associated with rupture events. CONCLUSION: Vision loss is the most pressing determinant of treatment. In the absence of visual symptoms, the aneurysm should be treated first by coil embolization. If not amenable to coiling, place flow diverting stent followed by six months of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. If visual loss is apparent, the adenoma-aneurysm spatial relationship becomes critical. In cases of an adjacent aneurysm, the adenoma should be removed transsphenoidally with extreme care and aneurysm rupture protocols in place. If the aneurysm is embedded within the adenoma, then a BTO is favored with permanent ICA occlusion followed by transsphenoidal resection if adequate collateral supply is demonstrated. If there is inadequate collateral supply, then an open-approach for amenable aneurysms with transcranial adenoma debulking should be performed.

Repeated superselective intraarterial bevacizumab after blood brain barrier disruption for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a phase I/II clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Pre-clinical evidence suggests bevacizumab (BV) depletes the GBM peri-vascular cancer-stem cell niche. This phase I/II study assesses the safety and efficacy of repeated doses of superselective intra-arterial cerebral infusion (SIACI) of BV after blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD). METHODS: Date of surgery was day 0. Evaluated patients received repeated SIACI bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) with BBBD at days 30 ± 7, 120 ± 7, and 210 ± 7 along with 6 weeks of standard chemoradiation. Response assessment in neuro-oncology criteria and the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method was used to evaluate progression free and overall survival (PFS and OS, respectively). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with a median age of 60.5 years (SD = 12.6; 24.7-78.3) were included. Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation was found in 1/23 (4%) patients. MGMT status was available for 11/23 patients (7 unmethylated; 3 methylated; 1 inconclusive). Median tumor volume was 24.0 cm3 (SD = 31.1, 1.7-48.3 cm3). Median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI 7.7-25.9) with 6, 12, 24 and 60 month PFS estimated to be 91.3% (95% CI 69.5-97.8), 47.4% (26.3-65.9), 32.5% (14.4-52.2) and 5.4% (0.4-21.8), respectively. Median OS was 23.1 months (95% CI 12.2-36.9) with 12, 24, and 36 month OS as 77.3% (95% CI 53.6-89.9), 45.0% (22.3-65.3) and 32.1% (12.5-53.8), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated dosing of IA BV after BBBD offers an encouraging outcome in terms of PFS and OS. Phase III trials are warranted to determine whether repeated IA BV combined with Stupp protocol is superior to Stupp protocol alone for newly diagnosed GBM.